<article>Cetinjaninu Draganu Kaluđeroviću određen je pritvor do 30 dana nakon hapšenja zbog sumnje da je ukrao 300.000 eura iz jednog budvanskog hotela i kazina - u kojem je, inače, bio radnik obezbjeđenja.To je Portalu ETV potvrđeno iz Osnovnog suda u Kotoru.Pritvor mu je, kako nam je rečeno, određen zbog opasnosti od bjekstva. On je nakon određivanja pritvora sproveden u Istražni zatvor u Spužu.</article>

Cetinjaninu Draganu Kaluđeroviću određen je pritvor do 30 dana nakon hapšenja zbog sumnje da je ukrao 300.000 eura iz jednog budvanskog hotela i kazina - u kojem je, inače, bio radnik obezbjeđenja.
To je Portalu ETV potvrđeno iz Osnovnog suda u Kotoru.
Pritvor mu je, kako nam je rečeno, određen zbog opasnosti od bjekstva.&nbsp;
On je nakon određivanja pritvora sproveden u Istražni zatvor u Spužu.

Anja Ivanović

original

viewImage

baseImage

610x380

500x500

400x240

400x203

1250x600

1084x550

thumbnail

Dragan Kaluđerović

Osnovni sud u Kotoru

Krađa

300.000 eura

Cetinjanin

Pritvor

Opasnost od bjekstva

Hronika

Kaluđeroviću mjesec pritvora zbog krađe 300.000 eura

Cetinjaninu Draganu Kaluđeroviću određen je pritvor do 30 dana nakon hapšenja zbog sumnje da je ukrao 300.000 eura iz jednog budvanskog hotela i kazina - u kojem je, inače, bio radnik obezbjeđenja.
To je Portalu ETV potvrđeno iz Osnovnog suda u Kotoru.
Pritvor mu je, kako nam je rečeno, određen zbog opasnosti od bjekstva. 
On je nakon određivanja pritvora sproveden u Istražni zatvor u Spužu.

The prosecutor at the Basic State Prosecutor’s Office Sanja Ražnatović dismissed the criminal complaint against Radan Katnić, the son of former Chief Special Prosecutor Milivoje Katnić, whom the Special State Prosecutor’s Office had attempted to accuse of illegally possessing a firearm.
On 30 December last year, the Basic State Prosecutor’s Office dismissed the criminal complaint against Katnić, explaining that there was no reasonable suspicion that he had committed the criminal offence of illegal possession of a weapon or any other offence prosecuted ex officio. The decision was delivered to Katnić’s attorney Ljubomir Raković.
The reasoning of the decision shows that the Basic State Prosecutor’s Office opened the case based on documentation submitted by the Special State Prosecutor’s Office in October 2024.
Katnić was questioned almost a year later, on 19 September 2025, when he denied the allegations in the criminal complaint before Prosecutor Ražnatović.
<h2>RUTHLESS ABUSE</h2>
His statement unequivocally indicates that he and his family were subjected to ruthless abuse during a police operation ordered by Prosecutor Šoškić. The entire operation was monitored by Šoškić himself, as well as by the head of the Special Police Department Predrag Šuković, who were in constant telephone communication with the inspector leading the operation.
As stated in the case file reviewed by the ETV Portal, Radan Katnić requested that his statement be entered into the record in full due to the inconveniences his family has been experiencing since the arrest of his father on 14 April 2024.
- I reiterate that I have never committed any criminal offence attributed to me by the accusation that I unlawfully possessed a „Zastava“ pistol. This is easily established by the fact that the pistol, with a valid firearm permit in my father’s name, was found in my father’s apartment in Dalmatinska Street - he stated during questioning.
He said that Special Prosecutor Miloš Šoškić abused his official position, claiming that he „is conducting illegitimate and illegal persecution of members of my immediate family in every possible way, for personal reasons stemming from a previous conflict with my father, who was his superior at the Special State Prosecutor’s Office“.
He described in detail how, on 14 April 2024, police officers arrived at the door of his apartment at six o’clock in the morning, where he lives with his wife and daughter. He stated that masked police officers carrying long-barrel automatic weapons („Heckler &amp; Koch“) forced him into his father’s apartment on the same floor. He later realized that the weapons carried by the police officers were loaded, with rounds chambered and ready for use.
- It goes without saying that I was in my father’s apartment against my will and under duress, and in the same situation, as I later learned, were my wife and my four-month-old daughter. There was no search warrant for my apartment, nor was I ever covered by an order of Special Prosecutor Miloš Šoškić, neither then nor now… Two inspectors entered the apartment together with officers in uniform, and one of them asked me whether I was Milivoje Katnić’s son, to which I answered affirmatively. After that, I asked what was happening with my family and why I had been forcibly brought in when this was not the apartment in which I live - Radan Katnić testified.
According to the record, an inspector replied that a search was underway by order of Prosecutor Šoškić in connection with proceedings initiated against his father and showed him the document. Katnić asked to see his wife and daughter, but was not allowed to do so, he was told that they were merely technically carrying out the search and repeatedly informed that everything was being done under the instructions and orders of Prosecutor Šoškić. He later learned from his wife that two female inspectors had kept her and the baby in their apartment, sitting on the bed, and did not allow her to move around or use her phone.
<h2>ŠOŠKIĆ AND ŠUKOVIĆ MONITORED THE OPERATION</h2>
Radan Katnić also pointed out that after he identified himself, the masked officers became more restrained, addressed him with respect, and explained that they had not known who they were coming to, that the operation was organized by the prosecutor, and that they usually act in cases involving serious criminals and murderers.
- Only then did they put down their weapons. From the moment they entered the apartment, the inspectors were in constant telephone contact with Predrag Šuković and Miloš Šoškić. I know this because I know both of them and recognize their voices - Radan Katnić said.
Twenty minutes after entering the apartment, the police asked him whether there was any weapon in his father’s apartment. He replied that he did not know and requested to speak with his father. His father told him that there was an old pistol in the wardrobe and explained where the key was.
He stated that he found the key, opened the wardrobe, found the pistol and the firearm permit, placed them on the table, and that the inspectors then put them in a bag. He continued to sit, as he said, and several times pointed out to the inspector that he was being held there unlawfully, to which he was told that „he would not move from the chair until the search was completed and until Milivoje arrived“.
- The inspector told me that my wife and daughter were fine and that nothing would happen to them. He addressed me politely and consulted Šoškić on everything. After four hours had passed, I asked whether the search would finally begin, to which they replied that it would not, because my father was unable to come - the younger Katnić stated.
Half an hour later, they confirmed that his father would not come, but did not inform him of the reason.
After some time, according to Katnić, a proposal arrived from Prosecutor Šoškić for him to sign a statement declaring himself the user of the apartment, after which his wife and child would be released.
In his statement to Prosecutor Ražnatović, he emphasized that he asked the inspectors several times whether signing a statement that he was the user of his father’s apartment could have any consequences for him. After consulting the prosecutor, a police officer told him that Šoškić guaranteed it was merely a technical and formal matter needed to obtain a search warrant in ccordance with the law.
<h2>WIFE AND CHILD „HELD CAPTIVE“</h2>
- With his explicit promise that my wife and child would be released, I agreed to be taken to the premises of the Special Police Department, where a statement was waiting for me, which I only signed and did not read, as I was told that it merely stated that I was the user of the apartment. When they brought me back home, they kept their promise and released my wife and child - the younger Katnić said.
As the search still did not begin, he was informed that, based on his signature, a new warrant was being requested. At that point, he was allowed to use his phone.
At 6:00 p.m., Radan Katnić left his father’s apartment, and the search was conducted in the presence of two witnesses. The police did not find anything illegal in Milivoje Katnić’s apartment.
Radan Katnić was categorical in stating that during the search of his father’s apartment he was held under duress and against his will, and that all elements of the criminal offences of coercion and unlawful self-help were thereby met.
The harassment by the Special State Prosecutor’s Office against former Chief Special Prosecutor Milivoje Katnić and his family has continued since his arrest in April 2024. There were attempts to deprive the Katnić family of their property as well, but the Supreme Court did not allow this.

Radan Katnić: Prosecutor Šoškić is persecuting my family

Premijer Španije Pedro Sančez proglasio je trodnevnu žalost u toj državi zbog željezničke nesreće u kojoj je poginulo najmanje 39 ljudi.
- Danas je bolan dan za cijelu Španiju - rekao je Sančez tokom posjete Adamuzu, selu u blizini mjesta nesreće, gdje su brojni mještani tokom noći pomagali hitnim službama u zbrinjavanju velikog broja povrijeđenih putnika, prenosi AP.
Nesreća se dogodila u nedjelju u 19 sati i 45 minuta, kada su zadnji vagoni brzog voza, koji je sa 289 putnika saobraćao na relaciji Malaga - Madrid, iskočili iz šina i sudarili se sa drugim vozom koji je dolazio iz suprotnog smjera.
Ministar saobraćaja Oskar Puente rekao je rano jutros da je uzrok nesreće nepoznat.
On je opisao nesreću kao "izuzetno čudnu", jer se dogodila na ravnom dijelu pruge, koja je obnovljena u maju.
Puente je kazao da je voz koji je iskočio iz šina bio star manje od četiri godine.

Trodnevna žalost u Španiji zbog željezničke nesreće

Na društvenim mrežama objavljen je video snimak nezgode koja se desila tokom plivanja za časni krst. Kako se vidi na snimku, jedan pop je upao u vodu dok su njegovi saputnici pokušavali da nasukaju čamac.
<div class="embed-block"><div style="max-width: 550px;"><div style="left: 0; width: 100%; height: 0; position: relative; padding-bottom: 100%;"><iframe src="https://cdn.iframe.ly/api/iframe?app=1&url=https%3A%2F%2Fx.com%2FVukasinPerovic%2Fstatus%2F2013273606470422664&key=87ca3314a9fa775b5c3a7726100694b0" style="top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; position: absolute; border: 0;" allowfullscreen></iframe></div></div></div>

VIDEO: Čamac nasukan, pop pao u vodu

Tri optužna akta za dva različita kriminalna djela – a iste poruke istog datuma! Kako je to moguće? Iz analize materijala, koji je tužilaštvo koristilo da bi podiglo optužnicu protiv Aleksandra Mijajilovića za šverc cigareta i kasnije šverc narkotika, proizilazi sumnja da su specijalni tužioci nezakonito manipulisali Skaj materijalom i da su poruke iste sadržine, dostavljene od Europola, umetnuli kao navodno dokazni materijal u više različitih istraga. &nbsp; Novinarski tim Televizije E - upoređujući tri različita tužilačka akta - identifikovao je najmanje dvanaest rečenica u porukama koje su istovjetne u različitim optužnicama i naredbama za sprovođenje istrage. &nbsp;  <figure> <img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260119190124_2b433b6fcb9a25c03780db3072b4725532304e26097fa84d127d0b4429b9ff4b.png" data-media-id="editor_0" data-image-id="20260119190124_2b433b6fcb9a25c03780db3072b4725532304e26097fa84d127d0b4429b9ff4b" data-rendition-name="original" width="1600" height="946" loading="lazy" alt="DOKAZ O MANIPULACIJAMA: Poređenje poruka iz optužnice za švec cigareta i šverc kokaina iz Ekvadora"> <figcaption>DOKAZ O MANIPULACIJAMA: Poređenje poruka iz optužnice za švec cigareta i šverc kokaina iz Ekvador(Photo: Portal ETV )</figcaption> </figure>  ,,ČAROBNI BROJ 12” (30. 11. 2020.) 5S7GLO: Dje god idu brodovi iz ekvadora ja mogu poslat. Ima li dje vadjenje na sigurno... Dal ima kontrolu u neku luku. (30. 11. 2020.) DN3GOV: Jel zanimljivo bugarska i grcka. Najvjerovatnije ima tu vadjenje. Tu salje u kont sa drugom robom pa se preuzme cijeli kontejner. (30. 11. 2020.) 5S7GLO: To bi bilo topp u kontejner sa drugom robom. Iz bugarske se Mora poslat na drugo mjesto. Al to nije problem, organizovali bi (01.12.2021.) DN3GOV: Moze i makedonija? (01.12.2020.) 5S7GLO: Dje ima luka u makefoniju. Slalo se za holandiju iz bugarske kamionima Navodno je ovo komunikacija koju su tokom dva dana razmjenjivali odbjegli policajac Ljubo Milović i tadašnji prikriveni agent Petar Lazović. I to u dva slučaja – za planiranje švecra kokaina iz Ekvadora, ali i za planiranje šverca cigareta iz iste zemlje. &nbsp; VIŠE MANIPULACIJA ISTIM PORUKAMA Upravo ove poruke državni tužilac Miroslav Turković 10. juna prošle godine uvrstio je u optužnicu protiv Aleksandra Mijajlovića i još sedam osoba za šverc cigareta. I to ne jednom već dva puta – jer se iste poruke citiraju na 114, a potom, na 160-oj strani. &nbsp; I tu nije kraj: istih 12 rečenica upotrijebljeno je u istrazi protiv Radoja Zvicera, Vuka Vojinovića, Petra Lazovića, Aleksandra Mijajlovića i još sedam osoba za drugo krivično djelo – šverc kokaina. Promjenjena je samo stranica, pa se u toj optužnici poruke nalaze na 20 strani. &nbsp;  <figure> <img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260119190128_645a96217e401ac8cf21b0294fdfb94e025d1c7cf6d6ac02d83d7523040d3d5e.jpg" data-media-id="editor_1" data-image-id="20260119190128_645a96217e401ac8cf21b0294fdfb94e025d1c7cf6d6ac02d83d7523040d3d5e" data-rendition-name="original" width="3000" height="1943" loading="lazy" alt="KO JE UBACIVAO SKAJ PORUKE: Potpisi troje tužilaca - Medojevića, Vukotića i Janković"> <figcaption>KO JE UBACIVAO SKAJ PORUKE: Potpisi troje tužilaca - Medojevića, Vukotića i Janković(Photo: Portal ETV )</figcaption> </figure>  U naredbi za sprovođenje istrage, koju potpisuju specijalni tužioci Ivan Medojević, Jovan Vukotić i Maja Janković – nema objašnjenja: kako je moguće da su iste poruke, istoga dana, iste godine tobože razmjenjivali Ljubo Milović i Petar Lazović i za šverc kokaina i za šverc cigareta? &nbsp; Ove činjenice bude sumnju da je neko, iz Specijalnog policijskog odjeljenja ili Specijalnog državnog tužilaštva, nezakonito umetnuo Skaj poruke. &nbsp; Osim sitnih tipografskih razlika, iste se poruke pojavljuju u optužnici za šverc cigareta od 10. juna 2025. godine, Naredbi za sprovođenje istrage za krijumčarenje kokaina od 5. decembra 2022. godine, ali i u krivičnoj prijavi 31. jula 2022. godine. &nbsp;  <figure> <img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260119190128_3f7d9c3934fdf9c2adb6483f33cc9161a7c31ad8843b85005514f2cd62e1f2a8.jpg" data-media-id="editor_2" data-image-id="20260119190128_3f7d9c3934fdf9c2adb6483f33cc9161a7c31ad8843b85005514f2cd62e1f2a8" data-rendition-name="original" width="271" height="186" loading="lazy" alt="POSTOJI LI OBJAŠNJENJE ILI JE ĆUTANJE ZNAK ODOBRAVANJA: Predrag Šuković, šef SPO"> <figcaption>POSTOJI LI OBJAŠNJENJE ILI JE ĆUTANJE ZNAK ODOBRAVANJA: Predrag Šuković, šef SPO(Photo: UGC )</figcaption> </figure>  I sve to uz prepravljanje podataka iz Obavještajnog dokumenta Europola koji je 16. jula 2021. godine poslat na adresu Predraga Šukovića, šefa Specijalnog policijskog odjeljenja?! KO JE ,,PREPRAVLJAO” DOKUMENT EUROPOLA? Europolov dokumenat, u koji je novinarska ekipa ETV imala uvid, ni na jednom mjestu ne pominje Aleksandra Mijajlovića, niti se u dostupnim dokumentima pojavljuje nadimak ,,Aco”. &nbsp; Važan detalj - kako se taj nadimak odjednom nalazi u naredbama za sprovođenje istrage i kasnije u optužnicama – &nbsp;nije interesovao sudije Višeg suda koji su potvrđivali optužnice Specijalnog tužilaštva. &nbsp; Prema tekstovima optužnice i naredbe o sprovođenju istrage, u razmjenu poruka o švercu cigareta iz Ekvadora sa Petrom Lazovićem tobože se uključio i Aleksandar Mijajlović, navodno koristeći kriptovani telefon i šifru 50IQOW. &nbsp; Njemu, kako tvrdi specijalni tužilac Turković, Petar Lazović prenosi 18 poruka Ljuba Milovića iz njihove komunikacije od prethodnog dana. I pokušava da sazna da li je čovjek sakriven iza šifre 50IQOW. -Jesam- odgovara kratko Lazovićev sagovornik. &nbsp;  <figure> <img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260119190132_a10861baffaaa3ded24064d84df05ddcf9ab5985ee00fb45ca160a75751c6e6e.png" data-media-id="editor_3" data-image-id="20260119190132_a10861baffaaa3ded24064d84df05ddcf9ab5985ee00fb45ca160a75751c6e6e" data-rendition-name="original" width="1013" height="762" loading="lazy" alt='SPECIJALNO ČITANJE DOKUMENTA EUROPOLA: Detalj gdje se identifikuje nadimak ,,Miki" i ,,Novi Miki"'> <figcaption>SPECIJALNO ČITANJE DOKUMENTA EUROPOLA: Detalj gdje se identifikuje nadimak ,,Miki" i ,,Novi Miki"(Photo: Portal ETV )</figcaption> </figure>  KAD ,,MIKI” POSTANE ,,ACO” U optužnici je evidentirana samo jedna kratka poruka za koju se tvrdi da Aleksandar Mijajlović potvrđuje svoje prisustvo na mreži. &nbsp; Na 403 strane optužnice ne postoji dalja komunikacija Mijajlovića, navodno sakrivenog iza šifre 5OIQOW, bilo sa Petrom Lazovićem ili Ljubom Milovićem. &nbsp; Osim toga, Europol ni na jednom mjestu ne pominje ime Aleksandra Mijajlovića, niti se pojavljuje nadimak ,,Aco”. Naprotiv: pominje se korisnik koji koristi dva nadimka: Miki i ,,Novi Miki”. Nema objašnjenja kako se onda nadimak ,,Aco” našao u tužilačkim spisma ? Ti važni detalji, ta suštinska pitanja o tužilačkom radu nijesu interesovali sudije Višeg suda, ali ni sudije Vrhovnog suda koji su pred Novu godinu produžili pritvor Mijajloviću. &nbsp; Ili možda niko, čak ni sudije Višeg i Vrhovnog suda, nijesu detaljno čitali optužnicu? Da je neko ozbiljno pročio tužilačke akte, lako bi uvido ključne kontardiktornosti. &nbsp;  <figure> <img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260119190136_f4bd9c97afe23dda9bdbc4caa7301cf53fcbfdff66cda9be592dd9b1798fb7af.jpg" data-media-id="editor_4" data-image-id="20260119190136_f4bd9c97afe23dda9bdbc4caa7301cf53fcbfdff66cda9be592dd9b1798fb7af" data-rendition-name="original" width="810" height="540" loading="lazy" alt="SDT JEDINI ZNA ZA ŠVERC CIGARETA IZ EKVADORA: Luka Gvajakil"> <figcaption>SDT JEDINI ZNA ZA ŠVERC CIGARETA IZ EKVADORA: Luka Gvajakil(Photo: UGC )</figcaption> </figure>  KO JE SMISLIO PRIČU O ŠVERCU CIGARETA IZ EKVADORA? &nbsp; Nije se čitao, ili nije bio od SDT-a dostavljen sudijama i dokument Europola. Tako se u odjeljku 3.36, naslovljenom ,,Krijumčarenje kokaina sa Ekvadora” objašnjava suština Skaj konverzacije koju navodno vode Ljubo Milović i Petar Lazović. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; -Dana 30.11.2020. godine Ljubo Milović (SKY 5S7GLO) je pitao korisnika SKY DN3GOV Petra Lazovića da li ima nekog da ima pristup bilo kojoj luci jer on može da pošalje pošiljku iz Ekvadora u bilo koju luku. Lazović je pitao da li se mogu paketi droge istovariti bezbjedno. Milović da on trenutno radi samo u Roterdamu, a da je prije toga radio u Istanbulu, Hamburgu i Atverpenu – piše u pratećem dokumentu Europola uz poruke koje su navdono razmjenjivane. &nbsp;&nbsp; Ne treba biti ekspert da se zaključi: nije moguće da se poruke koje se, navodno, razmjenju prije realizacije posla sa švercom kokaina, ponavljaju u sadržaju poruka kojim se priprema šverc cigareta. I to iz Ekvadora, iz luke Gvajakil, iz koje do sada nije zabilježen šverc cigareta?!  <figure> <img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260119190140_737afb5dd363b6bbb397d11cb7ec8769a8fa7b73c8b2e5a3c6a1818032e62eec.jpg" data-media-id="editor_5" data-image-id="20260119190140_737afb5dd363b6bbb397d11cb7ec8769a8fa7b73c8b2e5a3c6a1818032e62eec" data-rendition-name="original" width="900" height="582" loading="lazy" alt="HOĆE LI BITI REAKCIJE, KONAČNO: Vladimir Novović "> <figcaption>HOĆE LI BITI REAKCIJE, KONAČNO: Vladimir Novović(Photo: UGC )</figcaption> </figure>  Uporedna analiza više dokumenata tužilaštva dovodi u pitanje validnost rada specijalnih tužilaca, vjerodostojnost optužnih akata, ali i upozorava na postojanje osnovane sumnje da je bilo netačne, time i nezakonite, upotrebe Europolovih podataka. Da li je bilo i zloupotrebe službenog položaja - to bi trebalo da provjere u vrhu Specijalnog državnog tužilaštva na čijem je čelu Vladimir Novović. &nbsp; Ukoliko glavni specijalni tužilac ostane bez reakcije, kao što se dešavalo u slučaju zloupotrebe poruka koju je otkrio tim advokata Anta Nobila na suđenju Milivoju Katniću, Zoranu Lazoviću i Saši Čađenoviću – trebalo bi da se oglasi Tužilački savjet. U prilozima koje će Televizija E emitovati, a Portal ETV objavljivati narednih dana - precizno će se evidentirati dodatne manipulacije Skaj dokumentima koje je poslao Europol. &nbsp; &nbsp;

SKAJ PODVALA: Kako je SDT u slučaju Aleksandra Mijajlovića koristilo iste poruke za istrage šverca cigareta ali i šverca kokaina?

Radan Katnić: Tužilac Šoškić progoni moju porodicu

Kolumne

Kolektor za vlast

Društvo

Vukšić saslušan u Kotoru nakon tri prijave Pajković, još se čeka potez tužilaštva

(FOTO i VIDEO) Botunjani neće na razgovore dok se ne povuku mašine: "Što god se desi u narednom periodu - odgovorni su Glavni grad i Vlada"

Kaluđeroviću mjesec pritvora zbog krađe 300.000 eura

Tagovi

Radan Katnić: Prosecutor Šoškić is persecuting my family

Trodnevna žalost u Španiji zbog željezničke nesreće

VIDEO: Čamac nasukan, pop pao u vodu

SKAJ PODVALA: Kako je SDT u slučaju Aleksandra Mijajlovića koristilo iste poruke za istrage šverca cigareta ali i šverca kokaina?

Programska šema

PRATITE TVe UŽIVO